Bizzare, strange and, if it wasn’t for the understanding that some people still think like people did in before the Age of Enlightenment, it wouldn’t be comprehensible!

In the UK, the head Islamic Cleric says it’s OK to kill gays…

*BUT…*

Palestinian Gays fleeing to Israel!

Hmmmmmm….There are gays among the Muslims are….figuring out that their “enemy” will treat them with more respect and most likely save their lives….

If enough Muslims, who are gay, not that there’s anything wrong with that, move into Israel, maybe Israel will be saved from extermination!

Just thinkin’…

From Part II of the series, I stated on 10/03/2006, as the Mark Foley scandal began:

I will, once more, predict (and I’m certainly no oracle), that, as one TV correspondent says last night, they are getting many emails from other pages. It is only realistic to believe, that the subjects being discussed in those emails coming in will include human beings, most likely almost exclusively male, and, there ceratinly may be some Democrats in the bunch. Whether that is disclosed before or after the elections next month isn’t necessarily the issue, but the fact that it’s a human condition in the sexually related society we live in. The “backsplatter” will get those who are making exceptionally bad (and in some cases, illegal) choices, but it isn’t reasonable to brand everyone of their party as participating in the same behavior.

Well, it didn’t pop out quite as I envisioned, but…James Webb seems to have quite the active imagination.

I’d be willing to bet many conservative minded Virginians, who may have been leaning towards a “punishment vote” mentaility will come back and decide to cast one for George.

How will the Dems portray this one? “He only wrote about it, so it’s a freedom of speech issue! Nah! Nah! Nah!” If that’s so, then I guess text messaging 18 or older used to be pages before, but are not now and are not minors anymore when it occured, should similarly be consider the same? Nope…not via the media’b’Allah. You see, it will come down to the party who supports the organization that supports the ACLU as opposed to one from the party who says such things are a danger and asks for laws to protect people from it.

Anyhow, I tried to warn the Democrats, but no, they didn’t listen and all I did was recall some not so distant history of the “culture of corruption screeching to try and help.

Geez…’nuff said

H/T: Right Wing Nation

…report to the West Coast for duty.

OOOOOOOORAH!!!!

Can they think of things more disgusting to make money on? Response from “Down Under”:

Oh, yes, someone can….

Trackbacked at: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns

Found in an article regarding a Muslim cabbie in England who stole a serviceman’s identity so he could keep driving. He was found guilty of:

“…perverting the course of justice.”

I think there are many judges and legislators, from the federal to local levels to whom this would apply. Too bad we don’t have this crime on the books…

Days later, I’m still waiting (not so anxioulsy, becuase I got tired of turning blue in the face, like my mom said I would) for an angry response from the feminists of the US, or anywhere in the world…

I guess that begs the question:

If an Islamic Cleric makes a horribly sexist and clearly misogynic speech and no feminists respond, is it then acceptable to agree with him?

Side note: He also dissed all men, who, as someone on one of the blogs commented, could be looked at as no more than leg humping morons, who cannot resist their animal desires.

But…this story has “legs,” and adds an interesting twist:

Sheik al Hilaly says he won’t quit.

Another side note: Note the caption on the picture for the article. I’d say the media’b’Allah are in their glory, once again, misrepresenting reality.

So, the man who thinks so little of women as to call them uncovered meat, tools of Satan, and wouild be run out of Washingotn, DC, tarred, feathered and torched (if, and only if, he was a Republican) for comments far less extreme, thinks he’s on the right track.

Now, take a look throught the window of an Islamic leaders mind, and, realize he is in Australia, not in the US, or a Middle Easertn country:

After midday prayers today, the sheik was besieged by a group of reporters who asked him whether he would bow to demands and quit.

The Islamic clergyman smiled and shook his head, saying in English: “After we clean the world of the White House first.”

Note the captilization. Note there isn’t a “White House” thingy in Australia, but, yep, you guessed it, in the US. So, it’s really all about the US.

Clue for the liberals/Democrats/anti-war crowd: Go ahead, get your “Man” (which may include HIllary) in the “White House” and see if the Sheik changes his rhetoric. He didn’t say: “After we clean the world of the George Bush first,” which would have rendered an entirely different meaning to the conflict.

But then, they just hate George Bush, too, and it’s not just for Muslim Clerics anymore!

Trackbacked at: Point Five, Church and State, Woman, Honor Thyself, Right Wing Nation, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns

A few days ago, as the media’b’Allah was full of printed ‘shouts’ of “Tet! TET! TEEETTTT!!!!!,” I posted some of my thoughts on the similarities and differences of the analogy of the Tet Offensive in Vietnam and the War on Terror now. David of Third World County added to the analysis on his blog.

This morning, while scanning Town Hall, I came across this editorial from someone who comprehends the issue far better than I ever will, LtCol. Oliver North, USMC (Ret).

He was on the ground in that war, as an Marine Officer in an infantry company. I was still in High School, but we see the issue form a common view point:

The war in Vietnam wasn’t lost during “Tet ’68” no matter what Cronkite said. Rather, it was lost in the pages of America’s newspapers, on our televisions, our college campuses — and eventually in the corridors of power in Washington. We need to pray that this war isn’t lost the same way.

Amen, brother, amen!