<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Beginning to Think the Left Buys into &#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s not random, it&#039;s CHAOS!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:11:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: third world county</title>
		<link>http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8502</link>
		<dc:creator>third world county</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/#comment-8502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Thinking Blogger Award...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks, Stanford and Angel! You&#8217;ve both given me much to think about, and though you both deserve tag backs with noms of your own, since you&#8217;ve both been tagged, I&#8217;ll try to go further afield with my own tags&#8230;

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Thinking Blogger Award&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thanks, Stanford and Angel! You&#8217;ve both given me much to think about, and though you both deserve tag backs with noms of your own, since you&#8217;ve both been tagged, I&#8217;ll try to go further afield with my own tags&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2007/03/29/im-beginning-to-think-the-left-buys-into-intelligent-design/#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>Rabbit trail:

For a real mindbender, try the views on evolution of an agnostic engineer/science/science fiction author in James P. Hogan&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webscription.net/chapters/0743488288/0743488288.htm?blurb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kicking the Sacred Cow&lt;/a&gt; Hogan pretty well demolishes Darwinian/NeoDarwinian pretensions of science. 

And one of the foremost proponents of Intelligent Design--before creationists* hijacked it--was the agnostic astrophysicist, Sir Fred Hoyle.

BTW, more on point, the leftists seeing the Almighty Karl as the &quot;intelligent designer&quot; is great soap opera. More of this sort, please. :-)

*Note: I make a rather hard and fast distinction between reasonable people who believe the biblical creation account (yes, there is one: manufacturing two &lt;i&gt;inharmonious&lt;/i&gt; accounts from the biblical narrative requires biblical illiteracy) and &quot;creation scientists&quot; who dishonestly twist science &lt;i&gt;just as much as&lt;/i&gt; evolutionists do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabbit trail:</p>
<p>For a real mindbender, try the views on evolution of an agnostic engineer/science/science fiction author in James P. Hogan&#8217;s <a href="http://www.webscription.net/chapters/0743488288/0743488288.htm?blurb" rel="nofollow">Kicking the Sacred Cow</a> Hogan pretty well demolishes Darwinian/NeoDarwinian pretensions of science. </p>
<p>And one of the foremost proponents of Intelligent Design&#8211;before creationists* hijacked it&#8211;was the agnostic astrophysicist, Sir Fred Hoyle.</p>
<p>BTW, more on point, the leftists seeing the Almighty Karl as the &#8220;intelligent designer&#8221; is great soap opera. More of this sort, please. <img src='http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>*Note: I make a rather hard and fast distinction between reasonable people who believe the biblical creation account (yes, there is one: manufacturing two <i>inharmonious</i> accounts from the biblical narrative requires biblical illiteracy) and &#8220;creation scientists&#8221; who dishonestly twist science <i>just as much as</i> evolutionists do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
